Knowledge Management – L. Prusak

The word Where Did cognition Management Come From by L. Prusak discusses distinguishable perspectives on festering of familiarity perplexity, analyzes impact of globoseization on noesis forethought and identifies disciplines which have shaped the field. The word is retrieved from online database devoted to association management and cerebrate issues.To find the name I had to nurture to online search engines. condescension the fact that the subject is found in the Internet database, it is rattling scientific, opinionative and informative as the creator provides examples and good evidence to defend his positions, opinions and ideas. I think companionship management plays crucial role like a shot in business world as it aims at perusing up economic and pecuniary development on both national and international levels.Prusak writes that nowadays familiarity management is widely know and practiced in many companies and organizations as it gives an excellent opport unity to look back, to oblige faults and to work come out new perspectives. several(prenominal) analysts assert that noesis management whitethorn replace declining revenues from the waning re-engineering movement, whereas others claims that association management is able to enrich data and training management methods.Prusak says that perhaps the majority of sceptics affect the positionnot an unnatural 1that every so-called new approach shot is, in reality, either aged or wrong. (Prusak 2001) It is necessary to note that Prusak defines noesis management as system of estimation and says that it is a combination of new ideas with old practices. He means that practitioners should be re-assured sooner than unnerved.The author also discusses intimacy management in terms of globalization context. He says that globalization is the most obvious culprit. He argues that the volume of global trade is presumable to be unprecedented. Today the number of global products is the highes t comp ard to the previous years. breeding technologies are the capital contri scarcelyor of speeding up intricacy of global trade and the decline of concentrate economies. It results in frenetic atmosphere deep down companies which are simply forced to bring new products as fast as possible.The central idea of the article is that association can be hardly codified, digitized and distributed. The describe components of association are considered design, decisions, judgment, leadership, innovation, persuasiveness, and humor. They become to a greater extent valuable than in the past years. Prusak claims that a perhaps less evident but no less important impetus is an emerging cognition-centric view of the flying. (Prusak 2001) He cites Sidney Winter who describes pixilateds as organizations that know how to do things. (Prusak 2001)It is necessary to underline that economists define firm as a directd order of battle of capabilities and abilities base on experience, knowled ge and history. cognitive and social skills may limit firms effectiveness if not managed properly. Knowledge is claimed to the building block of the mentioned capabilities, especially knowledge which is the most specific to communitys objectives and operating areas.The next point to apply is that the author identifies primary disciplines which helped to shape the filed of knowledge management. The first is economics. Prusak assumes that if a company manages to coordinate the learning process it will be able to increase effectiveness and productivity. Otherwise, the company may fail to compete. Working out learning strategies is important issue in knowledge management.Secondly, sociology also contributes development of knowledge management on micro and big levels. For example, at micro level sociologys strong research interest in the complex structures of internal networks and communities has obvious relevance to knowledge management. (Prusak 2001) The author suggests that knowle dge is growing as practitioners are studying networks and communities as the units of knowledge managements. Finally, philosophy and psychological science contribute knowledge management as it aims at revealing implicit and hard-core knowledge as well as exploring differences between know how and know what.Further, Prusak distinguishes one-third practices which affect the content of knowledge managements. They are information management, human capital and the tone movement. Information management has been swiftly development during the 70-80s. Usually, information engineering is understood as a subset of the larger information technology and information science world. (Prusak 2001) Information forms a body of the thought rivet on how to manage information and how to evade it.Information management deals also with operational techniques, inducement schemes and governance. The quality movement is claimed to concentrate primarily on internal customers and transparent goals. Howe ver, knowledge management hasnt achieved the levels of measurable success. Despite that fact, the quality movement adapted the goals to different purposes of knowledge management. Finally, human capital is based on strong theoretical base. adult male capital approach helps to identify financial advantage over other firms done training and professional education.The article discusses the origins of knowledge management, looks at past events and future development opportunities, and distinguishes key knowledge management components and practices. The article is directly think to the field of knowledge management as the author provides strong theoretical background of knowledge management, related disciplines and perspectives on future. The author tends to make raft more aware of benefits offered by knowledge management.Works CitedPrusak, L. (2001). Where Did Knowledge Management Come From. usable at http//www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/404/prusak.html Accessed March 5, 2008.